US policy with Russia
⇒ Warning. Any strategy does not guarantee profit on every trade. Strategy is an algorithm of actions. Any algorithm is a systematic work. Success in trading is to adhere to systematic work.
How the Historical Aggressive Policy of the U.S. Aligns with Its Modern Attempts to Improve Relations with Russia and What Hidden Motives Might Be Behind This Shift?
Introduction
The United States has historically pursued an aggressive foreign policy, frequently resorting to military interventions and political pressure to advance its geopolitical interests. However, in recent years, we have observed a contradictory trend: while sanctions and information warfare against Russia persist, attempts at dialogue and cooperation also emerge. What explains this duality? Is it a strategic maneuver or a necessity dictated by global realities? Let’s delve deeper.
Historical Context of U.S. Aggressive Foreign Policy
For much of the 20th and 21st centuries, American foreign policy has been characterized by interventionism. Here are some key examples:
Major Military and Political Interventions:
📌 Atomic Bombings of Japan (1945)
The U.S. dropped nuclear bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands. While officially justified as a move to hasten the end of World War II, many experts argue that it was also meant to showcase America’s newfound power to the Soviet Union.
📌 Korean and Vietnam Wars (1950–1970s)
U.S. interventions in Asia led to massive civilian casualties and the use of controversial weapons such as napalm and chemical agents (e.g., Agent Orange). These conflicts sparked prolonged crises and domestic anti-war movements.
📌 The Collapse of the USSR (1991)
The U.S. actively supported economic and political processes that contributed to the dissolution of the Soviet Union. The economic reforms imposed on Russia in the 1990s led to widespread poverty, criminal activity, and industrial decline.
📌 NATO Bombing of Yugoslavia (1999)
Under the pretext of humanitarian intervention, NATO, led by the U.S., launched an air campaign against Yugoslavia without UN approval, setting a precedent for unilateral military operations.
📌 Iraq Invasion (2003) and Syrian Conflict (2014–present)
The U.S. launched the Iraq War based on false claims of weapons of mass destruction, leading to regional destabilization. In Syria, the U.S. backed various armed factions in an attempt to overthrow the government.
📌 Policy on Ukraine (2014–present)
The U.S. played a pivotal role in the Ukrainian conflict, supplying weapons and exerting diplomatic pressure. Washington sees the Ukraine crisis as a tool to weaken Moscow and reinforce its control over Europe.
🔎 Conclusion: These events reveal that the U.S. often justifies military aggression under the banner of democracy and human rights while actually pursuing strategic and economic gains.
The Evolution of U.S.-Russia Relations
Since the Soviet Union’s collapse, relations between the U.S. and Russia have undergone several phases:
-
1990s – “Friendly Supervision”
The U.S. treated Russia as a defeated power and dictated economic policies. -
2000s – Restoration of Sovereignty
Vladimir Putin’s rise marked a shift toward strengthening Russia’s statehood, which irritated Washington. -
2010s – Open Confrontation
Following the 2014 Ukrainian crisis, the U.S. imposed strict sanctions and bolstered NATO’s presence in Eastern Europe. -
2020s – Reassessment of Strategy
With growing economic crises and escalating tensions with China, Washington has started reconsidering its approach toward Russia.
📌 Key Factors Affecting U.S.-Russia Relations:
- Economic Sanctions: While damaging, they have not succeeded in changing Moscow’s policies.
- Competition with China: The U.S. fears a strong Moscow-Beijing alliance that could challenge Western dominance.
- U.S. Domestic Politics: Russia is often used as a scapegoat in American internal disputes, particularly during elections.
Donald Trump’s Administration and Russia Policy
Trump frequently spoke about improving relations with Russia, but his policies reflected contradictions:
- Strict Sanctions Against Russia
- Pressure on Europe to Limit Energy Cooperation with Moscow
- U.S. Withdrawal from INF Treaty
- Attempts to Build Personal Rapport with Putin
📌 Conclusion: Trump likely saw Russia as a potential counterbalance against China, but his efforts were met with resistance from the U.S. political establishment.
Hidden Motives Behind the Shift in U.S. Policy
📌 Economic Interests:
- The U.S. seeks to reduce Europe’s dependence on Russian gas and promote its LNG exports.
- Sanctions serve as a tool to eliminate competition for American corporations.
📌 Geopolitical Calculations:
- The U.S. recognizes that isolating Russia strengthens its alliance with China, which is not in Washington’s interests.
- There may be an attempt to “divide” Russia and China to weaken their joint influence.
📌 Domestic Political Factors:
- Russia remains a convenient subject
Keywords:
#USA, #Russia, #geopolitics, #sanctions, #internationalrelations, #DonaldTrump, #China, #politics, #energy, #security
Meta-description:
Analysis of the historical aggressive policy of the United States, the hidden motives for changing course and the consequences for global security.
